WIN 8

Microsoft is on a knife edge: It is developing a version of Windows that could ensure its continued success in the computer market — or it could completely cannibalize Microsoft’s profits and lead to the slow, painful, obsolescent death.

Windows 8, when you cut to the chase, is a tablet-oriented, touch-first skin on top of Windows 7. If you take into account the actual software stack and runtime, calling Metro a “skin” isn’t accurate at all, but as far as consumers and companies are concerned, that’s exactly what it is. There are two problems with this: First, if you already use Windows 7 — and hundreds of millions do — there is little reason to upgrade to Windows 8, much in the same way that everyone eschewed Vista and stuck with XP. Second, if everyone goes out and buys a Windows 8 tablet, Microsoft would collapse in a frothing fit of unprofitability.

You see, Windows 8 tablets, especially ARM variants, will be used almost exclusively in Metro mode — or, more accurately, tablet mode. At this point, Windows 8 ceases to be a “PC” operating system in the conventional sense of the word and enters a market that is dominated by Apple and Android and apps that cost between one and 10 dollars. On the desktop, Microsoft charges anywhere between $30 (OEMs) and $125 (retail box) for a Windows license, with the average being around $60. Android, by comparison, is free, and effectively so is iOS. A Microsoft Office license is even more costly, with an average price in the hundreds of dollars region. Mobile word processing apps like the iWork suite or Documents To Go, by comparison, cost just a few dollars.

Here’s the tricky bit: Microsoft has free or cheap alternatives to Windows and Office in the form of Windows Phone 7, Office Mobile, and Office Web Apps. For around $15, OEMs can license an operating system that has all of the major mobile computing components and is a direct analog of the cross-platform iOS — but it can only be used on smartphones. To put this into perspective, though, remember that Microsoft gets around $15 per smartphone, or between $30 and $300 per desktop or laptop. If we look at Microsoft’s 2011 profits of $23 billion, 57% came from its Windows division (Desktop & Server) and 65% from Business (Office) (The totals come to 122% because of internal adjustments, and because Bing currently loses more than a billion dollars per year.) Windows Phone 7 and Xbox are flecks of crud on Ballmer’s heel in comparison.

Microsoft, then, simply can’t afford to put Windows Phone 7 on its tablet “PCs.” If, during the next upgrade cycle, hundreds of millions of people bought WP7 tablets instead of Windows 8 tablets, Microsoft would lose billions of dollars and eventually go out of business. Microsoft is stuck between a rock and a hard place: It needs to be a serious competitor in the tablet market, but it simply can’t compete with Apple and Android in terms of cost, a problem that is exacerbated by Apple’s profits deriving from hardware rather than software. Remember the HP TouchPad? It was fatter, slower, and heavier than the iPad — but cost more. Windows 8 tablets, even if Microsoft cuts the margins on its cash cow franchises, cannot compete with iOS or Android on price — it’s as simple as that.

Fortunately, at least if you’re a Microsoft fan, there is a way out of this razor-sharp dichotomy. One method is for Microsoft to stick to its guns and call these Windows 8 tablets — whether they’re x86 or ARM — PCs. The inexorable cost difference between Windows 8 tablets and the competition will be ameliorated by the sheer awesomeness of being able to do anything with a portable slate. This is the route that Microsoft is currently taking, and given Ballmer’s painstakingly conservative efforts to milk Office and Windows for as long as possible it’s really the only feasible path.

There’s another option, though; one that would scare MS shareholders and the industry itself into a shocked stupor. Microsoft could buy out Nokia and create a beautiful Windows Phone 7 tablet. With the hardware and software both in-house, MS could compete with Apple on cost and production values. Furthermore, Microsoft could give up on the Metrofied Start screen and focus on making Windows 8 a first-class desktop-and-laptop enterprise-oriented OS. There would be a dip in Windows and Office licenses as consumers shift from PCs to their WP7 tablets, but Microsoft could mitigate that by offering more subscriber services. Think of Xbox Live and Xbox TV, but on your WP7 tablet. Instead of paying $300 for an Office license, think of paying $5 per month for oodles of SkyDrive space and access to both offline and online Office suites.

After almost 30 years of thundering ahead in the same direction, it would take cajones the size of cantaloupes to rock the Windows revenue boat — but at the same time, going full steam ahead and squeakily stipulating that Windows 8 tablets are PCs dammit! is a risky ploy as well. After all, if there has ever been a time when the definition — and fate — of PC s in question, it is now.

he Windows 8 release date has been shrouded in a cloud of rumors. Most experts expect a late 2011 early 2012 release of the operating system. A recently leaked Windows 8 product cycle chart provides the answers needed to determine the release date of the next Windows OS by Microsoft.

You can take a look at the image here. The chart lists the planning, development and readiness product cycle of Windows 8 and related Microsoft products such as Internet Explorer 8, Windows Live Wave 4, Windows Live Wave 5 and Windows 7. It also lists major events.

Some events and products have already been held / released and it is possible to pinpoint the release date of Windows 8 by making the remaining calculations.

Here is what we know. Forum I and Forum II have been major events, the former held in December 2009, the latter in April 2010. The listing lists four additional event, Forum III to Forum VI. The next two events fall into the development phase of Windows 8, the remaining two into the readiness phase.

Internet Explorer 9 and Windows Live Wave 4 have either been announced with final dates (at least for the beta) or released already.

Forum II was held 4-5 months after Forum I. If we take this approach we can calculate the approximate month of the other four forums. This would mean between 16 to 20 months from April 2010 on which coincides perfectly with the projected late 2011 release date.

The Windows 8 beta should be released around June 2011 and the final release might even hit the stores at the same time that Windows 7 was released, which was October.

The Internet Explorer 9 product cycle confirms the findings. Microsoft has announced a beta release of Internet Explorer 9 for August 2010. This would be the same time that Forum III will be held, which is exactly four months after Forum II.

The chart may be a bit off since Windows Live Wave 4 was released in June. It could be that Microsoft has projected the Forum III conference for June / July instead.

Could also be that the chart is not 100% accurate and it can happen that development cycles need to be shifted, especially if major issues are encountered during development.

Still, we are pretty sure that Microsoft will release the beta of Windows 8 in or around June 2011 and the final release of the operating system in or around October 2011.

What’s your take on the chart? We are very interested in users who can provide us with additional information including Forum III to Forum VI dates.